Main

Why Call this Book "BLOGWARS?"

I have written two books that either explicitly or partially deal with war and the media: I don't like to just toss around the words "war" or "battle" indiscriminately where they don't apply. (See excellent discussion of this topic in Deborah Tannen's book on the "Argument Culture"

But I choose to call my book BLOGWARS because I felt the analogy is not strained. Most political bloggers I know take politics more seriously than do most politicians, political reporters, and pundits and political professionals I know: they care.

Sitting, as I did a few years ago, on the Board of the American Association of Political Consultants, getting to know many political workers, from media consultants to congressional staff, I perceived that although they care about issues and ideologies, most do not adhere to them fanatically. For example, Republican and Democratic political consultants, staffers and politicians will have friends across the fence or the chamber. Many view politics as a game or a business. But no rightblogger I know is pals with a leftblogger. I'm sure there are some ideologically driven political bloggers out there who vilify each other and then grab a brew together at the local pub, but I have never talked to them. For one thing, of course, cybercommunities do not tend to have cross-community mixers. There are plenty of incentives and opportunities for a Republican Congressional staffer and a Democratic party worker to have lunch in Washington, to play tennis, or even to marry: a rightblogger in Des Moines, Iowa and a leftblogger in Manchester, New Hampshire are confined largely to sniping at each other, sometimes viciously, online. That is not to say that dialogue does not exist. The political bloglands offer a marketplace of ideas, but we should keep in mind that the vendors in the stalls don't shake hands and go have drinks after a day of heated competition.

Hence this book. There are blog­wars out there: battles for who will hold offices of power, the resolution of vital issues, and over ideas to dominate the minds of the nation. The question of what effect blogs, bloggers, and blogging will have on politics, public affairs, public opinion, and policy-making is, then, one that will affect all of us, whether we blog or not.

Comments?

Posted on Friday, December 30, 2005 at 04:42AM by Registered Commenterdavid.d.perlmutter | Comments4 Comments

Reader Comments (4)

Love what you're doing, but here is a consideration. I've seen top political bloggers have Loyal Opposition type sidebar blogroll categories.

I've seen Left blogs link to Right blogs in post editorial. They honor each other's sincerity, intelligence, audacity, and investigative skills.

So the test of integrity is not by having friends on the Other Side. It's how you are open to their viewpoints, without compromising your own beliefs.

Business leadership is similar to political leadership. Though the public is cynical, trust is still the ruling factor.

No one takes a hysterical raving fanatic seriously. Often that kind of blogging is just an act to make money and notoriety.

Credibility, transparency, candor are intrinsic to the core values of blogging. I am a blog idealist and revolutionist. Thus, sharp tongued, anti-authority, and avidly confrontational. It's the wild wild west and we sir are the pioneers, the ones who gather the most arrows in their hair.

I speak of blogocombat. Do a Google search on that term and see me appear first: Vaspers the Grate, the King of Blogocombat.

There is harshing and flaming in the political blogosphere, certainly.

But I think there is much more so this going on: we HATE the MSM with venom, passion, and destruction.

It is Blogosphere vs. Old Media, Old Economy, Psycho Enronized Capitalism, Domination Systems.

Blog is the rise of individual voice against the MSM information hegemony.

Blog is simple, easy, fast web content publishing.

Blogs will do more than books ever dreamed of.
Thank you: very good points. In fact I'm going to quote you--if the darn @$@%&& book is ever finished--on the "loyal opposition" case.
August 26, 2006 | Registered Commenterdavid.d.perlmutter
Oh, I do have a section in my book on cross-currents among political bloggers. The situation is not as black and white as it seems.
August 26, 2006 | Registered Commenterdavid.d.perlmutter
Please see related 2-Feb-2008 LJWorld.com comments:

>> We need to vigorosly defend our “Fifth Freedom” from both framing errors (decision traps) and multi-media use of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) and CIA-type “PsyOps” techniques that continue influencing our perceptions of reality!<<

Source: <http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/feb/02/simons_attention_athletics_exceeds_far_more_signif/#comment_513524>

March 14, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBob-RJ Burkhart

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.